3 ms·
Right, it is met with "mah private platform" because it is a private platform, and this is a good argument.
by kspacewalk2 5y ago
Right, it is met with "mah private platform" because it is a private platform, and this is a good argument.
- Covzire 5y agoI wonder how proponents of this argument would feel if another industry was squarely in the hands of the right, like education. Let's say all the best educations were in private colleges and they didn't tolerate much in the way of left wing speech. Everyone knows that 3 SV companies have a politically charged uber-monopoly that they are exploiting to silence the political enemies of the DNC and increasingly enemies of the CCP. Everyone.
- textgel 5y agoNo it isn't. We've had years of progressives screaming that private companies aren't allowed to just do as they please simply because they are private. You aren't permitted to suddenly become an ardent liberty advocate simply because it suits you when you've been demanding regulation and authoritarianism previously.