3 ms·
The only standard mentioned in this thread was "beyond a reasonable doubt", to which someone replied that it should absolutely be the standard.
by azernik 5y ago
The only standard mentioned in this thread was "beyond a reasonable doubt", to which someone replied that it should absolutely be the standard.
- savingsPossible 5y agoDid you mean to say "social opprobium" (aka, lets get this guy fired and kicked out of places) should have a lower standard of proof than "beyond a reasonable doubt"? Because reading your post I understood that it should be lower then the civil standard (i.e.: "preponderance of evidence") Which I believe it *has*, but absolutely should not have