2 ms·
The issues he discusses seem to be addressed by phygg, essentially a combination of arvix and digg for physics: http://www.phygg.com/phygg/ http://www.phygg.com
by thret 15y ago
The issues he discusses seem to be addressed by phygg, essentially a combination of arvix and digg for physics: http://www.phygg.com/phygg/ http://www.phygg.com/phygg/
I see no reason why this shouldn't work for arvix as a whole.
- chalst 15y agoMost recent "paper" on Phygg, fram July 2nd, begins Red Bull Hats: Wholesale from factory, limited time! Get MLB Hats, NFL Hats, New Era Hats for your favorite teams. It's gathered net upvotes. Most papers there have been automatically cross-posted from Arxiv. I don't think we can take Phygg to be a proven model. There's a wider issue of how new gatekeepers can be established for such a new model.