3 ms·
Ok so now it's the manufacturer's fault if you expose containers without authentication on internet, that users are fine with just "believing" that their firewa
by 1337shadow 5y ago
Ok so now it's the manufacturer's fault if you expose containers without authentication on internet, that users are fine with just "believing" that their firewall works as they expect without even testing: that's perfectly fine, manufacturer's responsibility!
Except with GDPR, which makes you responsible for having regular security testing, I mean, just an nmap after changing your infra, it takes 2 minutes, and yet when you don't take these 2 minutes you find a way to blame the manufacturer. I mean, don't you /know/ that bots are scanning the internet for open unauthenticated services, and still want to be taken seriously. Back in the days every kid was doing it to host warez you know.
- gnyman 5y agoI am definitely not arguing users should not be responsible for what they do. My point is that companies (especially billion dollar companies) can, and should be (more) secure by default. I am also making the observation that this does not seem to get fixed by itself, rather it seems it needs regulation, which includes GDPR.