3 ms·
You didn't actually refute any of the points above, you only disagreed without any actual reasoning.
by httpsterio 5y ago
You didn't actually refute any of the points above, you only disagreed without any actual reasoning.
- shoto_io 5y agoWhich is exactly what I would do when I had signed strict NDAs...
- cunthorpe 5y agoWould you? Because NDAs are about not talking about something, not just not confirming. By denying some statements you'd probably still violate an NDA.
- shoto_io 5y agoYeah, maybe you're right. My experience with NDAs is indeed limited. At least that naive thought crossed my mind, which might be true for OP as well.
- bryanrasmussen 5y agotrue but in the case of 'Not fitting any "known" DoD drone means absolutely nothing.' I found that text enough to pinpoint the logical error in the original argument, to wit, every DoD drone was at some point unknown and thus not recognizable as such - whether or not such drones had any particular security clearance attached to them. I think point 4 was argued against with some actual reasoning.