3 ms·
As long as FPGAs are available to consumers, it will be possible to have a computer running on open hardware. On the front page right now is this project: https
by Alekhine 5y ago
As long as FPGAs are available to consumers, it will be possible to have a computer running on open hardware. On the front page right now is this project: https://github.com/stnolting/neorv32 https://github.com/stnolting/neorv32
It's possible right now to have an FPGA running an open-source RISC-V implementation. The software isn't there yet, but I expect this to change as more RISC-V boards get on the market. God knows how useful this 'bootleg' computer will be, but it's a foundation to build on, at least. There's already work on porting Debian to RISC-V.
https://archive.fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/riscvdebian/attachments/slides/3179/export/events/attachments/riscvdebian/slides/3179/Porting_Debian_to_the_RISC_V_architecture_FOSDEM_2019.pdf https://archive.fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/riscvdebian/a...
And with a free, open ISA, it's not impossible for smaller, independent manufacturers to crop up and produce their own chips, especially given that the US is now investing in chip-fab. (if there is demand. If nobody cares that they don't own their machines, we were screwed from the start.)
I see a lot more hardware content on Youtube nowadays. Channels like Ben Eater are educating people on how computers work, and more accessible FPGAs may help create a more flexible environment for hardware.
- contingencies 5y agoThis was pretty interesting read. Thanks a lot for your considered reply. It is so sad that licensing issues prohibit progress even at the academic level. We should have a public interest licensing-free zone around educational and academic institutions IMHO, this would align human interest with actual outcomes (free market for core ideas) instead of only respecting commercial interest.