3 ms·
When Google Maps came out in 2004 and revolutionized mapping with the sheer quantity of data presented unbelievably smoothly, there was a similar (though smalle
by rdw 5y ago
When Google Maps came out in 2004 and revolutionized mapping with the sheer quantity of data presented unbelievably smoothly, there was a similar (though smaller) excitment about "map-based" apps. It seemed like such a big blue ocean had opened and fortunes would be made on the back of new killer apps. I worked on a few prototypes myself and saw many pitches from various maps-based startups.
But pretty much only Yelp was able to succeed. There just aren't a lot of highly-monetizable applications that are primarily map-based. No one knew the limits at the time, though.
I think AR is in kind of the same place. The demos are mindblowing and there's enthusiasm, but there aren't a lot of killer apps with the state of the technology. For location-based apps, they really required a second piece in order to really open up the space: the smartphone. It may be that AR is waiting for some other supporting technologies before it becomes obviously laden with utility.
- Gollapalli 5y agoI think the key point with AR is: How do you interact with it? The smartphone works because of the touchscreen. The blackberry was cool, but the smartphone wasn't ubiquitous until the iPhone. Similarly, the PC works because of the mouse. Other computer systems existed, but normal people weren't really using them day to day until you had systems with a mouse. AR has a peripheral problem. There's just no easy way to interact with it.