This article seems to confusingly mix together free speech issues with the issue of whether things are true/moral. A lot of things are completely legal to say,

This article seems to confusingly mix together free speech issues with the issue of whether things are true/moral. A lot of things are completely legal to say, but obviously false (eg, 2 + 2 = 5) or abhorrent (eg, Kim Jong Un is a great leader). You can support free speech without agreeing with a particular viewpoint.