> We have pressing needs now--for example, reducing the influence of money in American politics. Is this a higher priority than reducing political tension/viol

> We have pressing needs now--for example, reducing the influence of money in American politics. Is this a higher priority than reducing political tension/violence? Or is it worth increasing the likelihood of political tension/violence by eliminating the filibuster? > The Senate should be made more democratic now. If the Senate flips in the future due to the will of the people, we will blow up that bridge when we get to it. This seems short-sighted. What does it even mean? How would it solve any problems if the opposition could undo the work in a matter of a few years?