4 ms·
Truly the latter. He was not a well-adjusted, grounded individual. Also, what benefit is there to the US to kill him? They already won. Being able to kill p
by willis936 5y ago
Truly the latter. He was not a well-adjusted, grounded individual.
Also, what benefit is there to the US to kill him? They already won. Being able to kill people you have custody of is a weak message compared to "nowhere is safe from us".
- colordrops 5y agoThey don't want him in the press talking. And it sends a message.
- willis936 5y agoThe message was already sent: you can't flee from the IRS once you are a target. Showing you're not afraid to kill enemies isn't nearly as chilling.
- watwut 5y agoPrisoners dont get to talk to press all that much. You are 100% of time under controll. And having him in prison for long sends even better message then maybe-murder-maybe-not.
- Gigamo 5y agoHe was literally tweeting up until a few days ago. What makes you think he'd need the press to "unveil" anything "they" "don't want him talking about"?
- colordrops 5y agoNo one was paying attention to his tweets. He'd get a lot of attention in an extradition.
- CRConrad 5y agoWhat high-level conspiracies was he supposed to have been a party to, that he could have leaked?
- bingidingi 5y agoThey don't want him in the press talking about what exactly? He didn't exactly come across as a guy that would flee to central america to keep decades-long secrets.