7 ms·
No, the best outcome would have been a trial with a fair outcome. But he went down to South America, started making drugs, and got accused of rape and murder.
by chris11 5y ago
No, the best outcome would have been a trial with a fair outcome.
But he went down to South America, started making drugs, and got accused of rape and murder. The legal system should assume innocence before trial, though in my personal opinion he was an evil man.
- beebeepka 5y agoWhat ecil did he do? Take drugs?
- viro 5y agohe was wanted for murder in Belize....
- beebeepka 5y agoI know that. Did he do it, or did he just piss the wrong US "officias". Downvote all you want. This guy clearly did not kill himself
- viro 5y agoyou know his life was basically over right? He was 75 years old . He was going to jail for at least 20 years.
- beebeepka 5y agoThat doesn't make him a murderer or suicidal.
- viro 5y agobruh ... who wouldn't be a lil suicidal when they find out they are going to jail for the rest of their life.
- beebeepka 5y agoBut you just said he was 75 years old. That's not a lot of jail time. Some guys are suicided, others simply decide to change their gender in jail. If you don't see how this works, then I have nothing more to say to you
- stickfigure 5y agoYou got the continent wrong. I don't have much of an opinion about McAfee, but it bugs me a bit when people who know less than I do have stronger opinions.
- okamiueru 5y ago> You got the continent wrong. I'm not the person you replied to, but, do you mean they got the continent wrong because Belize is in Central America, and thus technically North America? Seems like an unnecessary nitpick. If you thought he mistook Spain to be in South America, then, maybe the guidelines here would be of help. From my own experience, it is better to not assume people know less than you. Then again, maybe you are referring to something else, in which case it would be nice to know what.
- stickfigure 5y agoBelize isn't just "technically" North America, and misplacing it in South America is a not a minor nit. It shows a fundamental unfamiliarity with the subject. In my experience, norteamericanos that refer to everything south of the US border as "South America" tend to lump it into a mental box of stereotypes. I've spent a fair bit of time in Central America, and the people I met there generally took great umbrage at being referred to as "South America".
- okamiueru 5y agoI honestly fail to see what your point is, and as an argument, it does not impress me much. You went off your way to argue a minor inconsequential detail (yes, given what was discussed, it was inconsequential), and at the same time suggest they were less knowledgeable about the topic (which I might remind you, was not geographical terminology of land regions). You'll do yourself a favor to not insult people over technical details. The arrogant attitude does not give a good impression. If you wanted to make it known you knew something they didn't, you could have achieved much more with "Belize and Central-America for that matter is considered to be part of North America, and very explicitly not part of South America". There was no need to make a point of someone knowing less, or disparaging their argument that had little to do with this. In any case, do not mistake my interaction here as some sort of personal investment. I do not care much. Take the advice from a stranger as you will.