11 ms·
The UI, down to the content and styling of menus, looks a lot like Linear. I'm chuffed to see the best parts being borrowed, but it looks like they've made sub-
by fancy_pantser 5y ago
The UI, down to the content and styling of menus, looks a lot like Linear. I'm chuffed to see the best parts being borrowed, but it looks like they've made sub-tasks/issues too simple, as they aren't first-class issues, but mere checkboxes with short descriptions.
https://linear.app https://linear.app
- alkonaut 5y agoOn the other hand the “tasks are as heavyweight as the bugs or backlog items that spawned them” (often with just one task ie 1:1) creates a ton of overhead in e.g Azure Devops. Especially as efforts get spread out while rollup barely works. It’s also unclear whether PRs should be linked to tasks or the parent issue. I want more than a checkbox but less than an issue. A completion % and owner would be enough.
- armandososa 5y agoI often edit the description of an issue in linear just to breakdown the task using "markdown" checkboxes. In my mind: issues should correspond to a pull request and checkboxes to commits.