"Yes, it's effective at shutting people up. No, it's not very effective at convincing people that you're right." I see things differently, through the lens of

"Yes, it's effective at shutting people up. No, it's not very effective at convincing people that you're right." I see things differently, through the lens of power and influence. How much power does the opposition have if it's been effectively silenced? Members of the other side certainly aren't convinced of your cause, but what difference does it make? You've already gotten them to submit. As time goes on the younger people will pretty much only hear from the intolerant folks because the people who were silenced can't propagate their worldview effectively.