3 ms·

So, yeh I partly agree. However those orgs often have a Very Big License for GitHub Enterprise, and therefore with some enterprise porting tools it's not that

So, yeh I partly agree. However those orgs often have a Very Big License for GitHub Enterprise, and therefore with some enterprise porting tools it's not that high friction a switch (supplier managers will be all in favour; one less contract to manage!)

robinhood 5y ago
They mostly don't. Once you have Jira, you have Confluence, then Bitbucket. That many less contracts to manage.
- foobarbazetc 5y ago
  Yeah. We used to pay for GH Enterprise and run Jira/Confluence/Bamboo/etc/etc. Then we switched to BitBucket Server because it integrates better and cost a lot less, plus GH Enterprise was a weird black box VM back then that we had to hack into to make work for whatever reason. I couldn't point you to anyone who likes BitBucket Server, but as long as you're on the CLI and don't have to use the terrible web UI too much, it sort of works.
  - swebs 5y ago
    I've never had a problem with the web UI. My only complaint is that it doesn't render Jupyter notebooks.
  - mbo 5y ago
    I much preferred Bitbucket Server to Bitbucket Cloud. For context, Server is an entirely independent codebase to Cloud (not even a fork, just completely separate products).
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- ErrantX 5y ago
  Hard to be sure either way, but most of the sources I could find indicate this isn't true. E.g. https://www.slintel.com/tech/source-code-management/github-vs-bitbucket https://www.slintel.com/tech/source-code-management/github-v...