> developers would not spend effort reviewing something that doesn't matter. Or is that a bad assumption I'm making which the post does not. I'm in a large org

> developers would not spend effort reviewing something that doesn't matter. Or is that a bad assumption I'm making which the post does not. I'm in a large organisation that requires review for every change and I've certainly seen review cycles that took effort disproportionate to the level of importance and risk of the change. It doesn't happen every time, but it does happen. Sometimes you can solve it by separately talking to the reviewer and pointing out the low risk or temporary nature of what you're doing, but I've also seen people occasionally getting focused on Enforcing Quality Standards and they can get annoyed if they feel that you're trying to bypass the process.