4 ms·
> We expect men to pay for dates. Where are you from? This is not true everywhere. > We expect men to be the primary breadwinner in a marriage. In a mysogini
by aikah 5y ago
> We expect men to pay for dates.
Where are you from? This is not true everywhere.
> We expect men to be the primary breadwinner in a marriage.
In a mysoginistic vision of marriage in your culture, maybe.
It's fine if you see marriage as a business arrangement (readily available sex for money AKA prostitution). But don't pretend everybody views marriage the exact same way.
- epicureanideal 5y ago> In a mysoginistic vision of marriage in your culture, maybe. "Men expected to work hard and die early to provide for the family, women most affected." /s Men being expected to provide is not misogynistic. It places a burden on the man. Yes, if the woman were PREVENTED from working that would be misogynistic, but that's not what the parent comment said. The parent comment merely said that men are expected to pay, not that women are prevented from earning, and these are not the same thing.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- jessaustin 5y agoTFA is about Sweden. GP is comparing the misogyny of "expecting men to pay for dates" to the misogyny of Swedish persecution of sex work.
- aikah 5y ago> TFA is about Sweden. GP is comparing the misogyny of "expecting men to pay for dates" to the misogyny of Swedish persecution of sex work. There is no misogyny in cracking down on prostitution. The amount of trafficked women forced into prostitution greatly outweighs the amount of willing participants in that "business". Believing the opposite certainly is misogyny.