Comcast doesn't have a monopoly in Seattle. There are multiple providers from which he could procure service. Regardless, I'm curious what models people advoca

Comcast doesn't have a monopoly in Seattle. There are multiple providers from which he could procure service. Regardless, I'm curious what models people advocate. After all, there appears to be only one electric provider in Seattle. If we were, as proposed, to follow that model, then Comcast could negotiate to be the single service provider and then charge per usage. Is that more desirable than what we have now, where there are multiple providers offering different services at different rates? If we're to argue for something different, we should be aware of what we're arguing for.