> Vanbellinghen is asserting that Hubbard should not compete as a woman. Hubbard identifies as a woman. Not quite. Vanbellinghen is asserting that Hubbard shou

> Vanbellinghen is asserting that Hubbard should not compete as a woman. Hubbard identifies as a woman. Not quite. Vanbellinghen is asserting that Hubbard should not compete in the women's league. That is different from asserting she should not compete as a woman. She then continues to argue this is not because her identity is not female, but because of biological reasons. This is coherent because the point of a Women's league (in weight-lifting at least) isn't to segregate women from men, but to give women a place to compete without being crippled by biologically determined dis-advantages. Things get complicated because the reason for a Women's league existing, and the actual written rules around it do not quite line up. It might even be the case that for Hubbard to compete as women means she could not enter the men's league. That would then probably be a moral mistake in the rules.