3 ms·
Your definition fails to account for intersex and infertile people.
by cosmojg 5y ago
Your definition fails to account for intersex and infertile people.
- acituan 5y agoMy definition says "could produce gametes", not "can have offsprings". Re intersex; congenital anomalies do not define a category (if the term congenital anomaly offends you, I am using the WHO definition). Just like if we would say "humans have one head" we would be excluding congenital twins, or with "five fingers" we would be excluding polydactyly.