3 ms·
Unless you define "intolerance", your argument is just a meaningless assertion. I wouldn't call wanting to pretend something didn't happen as intolerance. You d
by exporectomy 5y ago
Unless you define "intolerance", your argument is just a meaningless assertion. I wouldn't call wanting to pretend something didn't happen as intolerance. You do?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- knownjorbist 5y agoIdeologically pure "free speech" leads to infringement on the rights of others, including their own free speech. There is a line to be drawn here.
- lp0_on_fire 5y agoThe people repeating that axiom are generally the ones who are defining the term, which seems...convenient.