Honest question, have you? >humans are generally biased towards protecting females. >These two differences in part explain why women relatively prefer jobs in

Honest question, have you? >humans are generally biased towards protecting females. >These two differences in part explain why women relatively prefer jobs in social or artistic areas. More men may like coding because it requires systemizing and even within SWEs, comparatively more women work on front end, which deals with both people and aesthetics >This leads to women generally having a harder time negotiating salary, asking for raises, speaking up, and leading. >Women on average look for more work-life balance while men have a higher drive for status on average I think the disconnect here is that the author is couching his claims with strawmen 'women prefer' and links to small-n surveys that you find sufficient (but most do not). Maybe if we refactored some of what he said, it would make sense: > people who excel at math are generally biased toward being short and unfriendly. >These two differences in part explain why STEM students relatively prefer working long-hours and avoiding meaningful human connection. More liberal arts students may like socializing because it requires EQ and even within startups, comparatively more PMs and SDRs have significant others. >This leads to engineers generally having a harder time receiving criticism, asking for help, staying out of others business, and collaborating. >Engineers on average look for peer praise while SDRs have a higher drive for wealth accumulation.