4 ms·
It's not fool-proof. In Canada in 1952, the province of British Columbia switched to a ranked ballot and it nearly ended in disaster. The ranked ballot was an
by thought_alarm 5y ago
It's not fool-proof.
In Canada in 1952, the province of British Columbia switched to a ranked ballot and it nearly ended in disaster.
The ranked ballot was an attempt by the traditional Liberal and Conservative parties to keep a rising socialist party from gaining power, as they assumed no Liberal or Conservative voter would choose the socialists as their second choice.
But there was so much animosity between the parties that most voters chose a fringe right-wing party as their second choice, as a protest vote.
The two traditional parties were wiped out and the fringe right-wing party narrowly won, despite having no leader and little governing experience.
Fortunately, saner heads took over the fringe party and quickly steered it to the political center as a sort of big tent party for former Liberal and Conservative voters. But it could have gone very differently.
The ranked ballot idea was quickly dropped, but the event shaped British Columbia politics for the next 60+ years. That fringe party elected by accident became the province's natural governing party.
I suppose the moral of the story is that no voting system can prevent irrational voters from shooting themselves in the foot.
- MichaelApproved 5y agoWhy are people presenting examples from parliamentary systems for an American voting process? The two systems are so dramatically different that no cautionary tale would ever be meaningful.
- dane-pgp 5y agoWhat aspects of parliamentary systems make it difficult to apply lessons from their voting systems to the voting systems used to elect representatives to the US Congress?
- grumblenum 5y agoSo voters almost got what they wanted and not what established interests thought they should be allowed to have? Frightening.
- mkoubaa 5y agoImagine unsarcastically arguing that "Ranked Choice Voting gives too much power to voters"