3 ms·
So seems like from this grouping of exec's: 1. make semi-custom Xeon chips for cloud providers with expected prices 2. make a competitor to the Apple M proces
by xt00 5y ago
So seems like from this grouping of exec's:
1. make semi-custom Xeon chips for cloud providers with expected prices
2. make a competitor to the Apple M processors?
3. keep making desktop class processors
4. everything else that Intel does (iot stuff, mobile-eye stuff, etc)
5. GPU / high performance computing stuff for cloud providers / HPC customers
Basically seems like the way they would differentiate things would be:
1. Apple M class processor competitor (low power, low cost, integrated GPU, reasonable core count)
2. Desktop class: compete directly with high core count AMD processors
3. Servers / HPC: ask the customers what they want and build it
4. deprioritize all of the "everything else" category except Mobileeye stuff
5. seems like stuff like discrete GPU's is the odd man out here, so probably will not be a priority
Probably missing something... hmm..
- b9a2cab5 5y agoYou forgot to mention they put the former Chief People Officer in charge of Datacenter & AI... where are the engineers?
- ZeroCool2u 5y agoThis took me by surprise at first too, but here's a bit more context: "Prior to her role serving as Intel’s chief people officer, she led Intel’s Network Platforms Group." From her bio: "Rivera holds a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Pennsylvania State University. She sits on the Equinix board of directors; she is a member of Berkeley’s engineering advisory board and a member of the Intel Foundation Board; and she is part of Intel’s Latinx Leadership Council."