2 ms·
That interpretation doesn’t read as a contradiction because its not. My interpretation is that communicating in a feminine style (more subtext, longer messages
by meowkit 5y ago
That interpretation doesn’t read as a contradiction because its not.
My interpretation is that communicating in a feminine style (more subtext, longer messages, longer + consistent correspondence is how I would interpret it) is what will get you a date, but initial attraction and in presence masculinity (communicated via a different conversational style, appearance, and behavior) is what is preferred.
So the contraction is that there is a difference in communication styles online and in person.
- majormajor 5y agoI think there is a difference in online and in-person communication styles for most people - at least for those of any literary bent at all, who get beyond stream of consciousness, unfiltered blathering of words into their keyboard - so that's why I don't see any contradiction in preferences of women who might want a literary written communication style but also want in-person chemistry that a woman pretending to be a man wasn't able to create.