3 ms·
Also, the chip obviously doesn't need to wear out to become less preformant over time. Reliability is perhaps the wrong word, I think quality would suit better.
by zelon88 5y ago
Also, the chip obviously doesn't need to wear out to become less preformant over time. Reliability is perhaps the wrong word, I think quality would suit better.
But in any case, if you have one chip that decreases in performance 10% per year due to security mitigations and another chip that remains consistently performant, it is something to consider when shopping.
- CyberDildonics 5y ago> But in any case, if you have one chip that decreases in performance 10% per year due to security mitigations Why would this be true?
- zelon88 5y agoBecause security mitigations contained in micro code updates regularly impact performance. I mean, no offense, but that is literally the focus of this article and this discussion.
- CyberDildonics 5y agoThis is a one time thing, where are you getting a pattern from? You hallucinated 10% a year from a single incident and called it "reliability".