3 ms·
Should this be in its own controller?
- sp332 15y agoWhat is this? And if you made this, there shouldn't be an apostrophe in "its".
- Semiapies 15y agoIt's someone jumping on an old meme: http://shouldiusetablesforlayout.com http://shouldiusetablesforlayout.com
- sp332 15y agoSo what's a controller, in this context? I've seen the meme before, I think the first one was http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/ http://www.hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/
- cfinke 15y agohttp://www.isitchristmas.com/ http://www.isitchristmas.com/ predates that one by a year.
- cfinke 15y agohttp://isthisyourpaperonsingleservingsites.com/ http://isthisyourpaperonsingleservingsites.com/ provides a surprising amount of information on these kinds of sites. "One of the earliest examples was islostarepeat.com [created in 2006]. This site indicated whether the episode of Lost playing during the current week was a new broadcast."
- PaulHoule 15y agoBut the context isn't so clear. All of us who "work the web" have confronted tables. Most of us are using "action-view-controller" frameworks for building web apps (in which some cases, a model gets used, and in some cases, actions are degenerate with controllers.) What exactly a controller is depends on your framework, and often controllers are stacked inside one another (in one system I work in, subcontrollers are stacked three deep.) In that particular system, there's an "object model" built on top of objects in the implementation language that allows an extreme level of reuse -- if you create a new type in the model, default controllers and views get inherited automatically so you get a lot of cool stuff for free.
- JakeSc 15y agoshouldimakeawebsitedomainforthis.com
- cfinke 15y agoNO
- brndnhy 15y agoInto it
- acanals 15y agowin
- bemaniac 15y agoInline styles. For shame.