> Hm. It does? My point is not saying anything is not part of "scriptural canon", merely that "CRT" as described is not actually taught in schools nor is it a c

> Hm. It does? My point is not saying anything is not part of "scriptural canon", merely that "CRT" as described is not actually taught in schools nor is it a clearly defined category. I think that it is an accurate enough label. Clearly this stuff is heavily inspired and informed by CRT. From what I can tell, it contains the essential elements of CRT, just distilled down for easier consumption. I think it is fair to call a curriculum authored by a confessed CRT advocate like Ibram Kendi Critical Race Theory. But again, people are not complaining because it is Critical Race Theory. People are complaining that it is harmful.