3 ms·
As I understand it, galaxies don't rotate like rigid bodies: stars further from the centre take longer to go round than ones closer in, much like planets furthe
by mjw1007 5y ago
As I understand it, galaxies don't rotate like rigid bodies: stars further from the centre take longer to go round than ones closer in, much like planets further from the sun take longer to complete an orbit.
If stars that start off inside an arm remain so, but the outer part of the arm goes round more slowly, the arm would get wound 'tighter' as time goes on, and this doesn't seem to happen.
I think what's really going on isn't yet well understood, but it's likely to be that the arms are something more like a standing pattern, and stars do indeed move in and out of the arms as time goes on (something like the way a traffic jam can move more slowly than the individual cars that it's made of).
- _ah 5y agoFair point. So maybe we should say that our sun would occasionally be a part of the galactic arm as the pattern morphs and re-forms. A fun concept.
- ananonymoususer 5y agoIt turns out that the stars further from the center don't take as long as one might think. Observations of this phenomenon led to the development of the theory of dark matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_curve https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_curve
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]