3 ms·
Yes, but at the cost of supply chain vulnerability. So it's either really cheap stuff, or long-term security of goods. Clearly the "really cheap stuff" angle h
by rglover 5y ago
Yes, but at the cost of supply chain vulnerability. So it's either really cheap stuff, or long-term security of goods.
Clearly the "really cheap stuff" angle has seriously embroiled American prosperity so it's arguable the benefits do not outweigh the costs in aggregate.
Personally, I'm in the "I'm happy to pay a bit more if my environment is peaceful because the people around me can eat and have a future" camp.