4 ms·
Agreed. 'Fshasm' would make the connection to F# clearer and avoid this confusion.
by chalst 5y ago
Agreed. 'Fshasm' would make the connection to F# clearer and avoid this confusion.
- aloisdg 5y agoFshasm is good idea and available on nuget (https://www.nuget.org/packages?q=Fshasm https://www.nuget.org/packages?q=Fshasm). We lost the author's wordplay though. I opened an issue on GitHub to talk about the name. Come join us :) https://github.com/d-edge/fasm/issues/5 https://github.com/d-edge/fasm/issues/5
- meijer 5y agoLooks a bit too much like "fascism" for my taste.
- chalst 5y agoThe Levenstein distance to either "Fasm" or "Fshasm" are the same, at three. I don't think that's too close.
- raegis 5y agoAnd the distance between "Levenstein" and "Levenshtein" is only one, so is this an OK misspelling? :)
- poloopolo 5y agoAs if you knew what that word means or as if there was any risk of confusion in this context.