3 ms·
Looks interesting, if very far from practical-- too bad it requires a "DGX" station to train It seems to flicker/fade things in alot, like the random poles tha
by TinkersW 5y ago
Looks interesting, if very far from practical-- too bad it requires a "DGX" station to train
It seems to flicker/fade things in alot, like the random poles that keep appearing and disappearing, it seems like there is not enough focus on temporal consistency or something?
- bruce343434 5y agoIf you see the source output image before it was upscaled you noticed the resolution is too low and thin objects "fall between" the pixels. The upscaler then interprets it as air, it seems.