3 ms·
Don't those amendments apply to individuals and not businesses? Also, the state already entered the game when evictions were suspended. If the choice from your
by nly 5y ago
Don't those amendments apply to individuals and not businesses?
Also, the state already entered the game when evictions were suspended. If the choice from your lender as a landlord is bankruptcy or having your mortgage term extended by 18 months, with an 18 month interest-free payment holiday now, if you have hard-up tenants, what would you choose?
- dragonwriter 5y ago> Don't those amendments apply to individuals and not businesses? (1) Landlords arr often ibdividuals, and (2) in any case, no, they apply to legal persons, generally. > Also, the state already entered the game when evictions were suspended There's a reason for different tolerance for litigation risk in those two actions, but in any case by providing essentially full-value compensation for the losses due to the earlier action, this action is not only on firmer ground viewed individually, but also greatly mitigates remaining litigation risk from the earlier action.