3 ms·
> And with types now in Ruby that's one less reason to pick Crystal over Ruby. The story around types in Ruby is very early. There are "competing" ways to do i
by multiplegeorges 5y ago
> And with types now in Ruby that's one less reason to pick Crystal over Ruby.
The story around types in Ruby is very early. There are "competing" ways to do it and they are really not dev ergonomic.
I think Ruby has a loooong way to go with typing to take it off the list of things to use Crystal for.
- vinceguidry 5y agoIt's not really. The earliest type system for Ruby as far as I can recall is sorbet, and it's been around since at least 2017.
- chrisseaton 5y agoType systems for Ruby go back to at least 2007 https://rubybib.org/#madsen2007 https://rubybib.org/#madsen2007