I know this is old, but... > The goal is to validate and associate a legal entity with a developer account, not a domain name. I'm saying that goal has failed

I know this is old, but... > The goal is to validate and associate a legal entity with a developer account, not a domain name. I'm saying that goal has failed. Setting up a company has a low, fixed cost for bad actors and there's plenty of malware signed by EV code signing certificates. > not a $10 domain name IMO domain names are worth a lot more than $10 once you start building a brand on them. For example, cars.com values their domain at $800 million dollars [1]. Obviously they couldn't sell it for that, but that's what they consider the brand value to be. I can start a "legal entity" for much, much less than the value I attribute to my domain. For small developers and good actors, I think being able to build identity around a domain based brand would be useful. Or, if it's _really_ about accountability, all code signing certificates should be issued to individuals who have validated their identity through a notary. And not using the terrible system the current CAs are using where some poor bastard in a developing country is expected to verify identity documents from a bajillion different legal jurisdictions. I guess I just hate the high pricing and terrible, terrible product that code signing certificates have become. 1. https://domaingang.com/domain-news/cars-com-domain-was-valued-at-872-million-dollars/ https://domaingang.com/domain-news/cars-com-domain-was-value...