3 ms·
You're fixating on that euphemism word, but it's actually irrelevant. You can even remove "euphemism" from my first statement and its meaning won't change. The
by akomtu 5y ago
You're fixating on that euphemism word, but it's actually irrelevant. You can even remove "euphemism" from my first statement and its meaning won't change. The key word there is "equates".
Besides, I wouldn't lose it over this fairly boring argument. Emotion is a powerful tool when you keep it on leash, but is a source of misery when it leads you.
- vmception 5y agoYes it is a pedantic premise and conversation I agree that its great that there is a normalized inclusive context that allows the benign similarities between philosophers and music to be acknowledged, instead of their less benign differences such as the philosopher’s erotic performances