Like I said, my objection was based on the way you had phrased that last sentence in your comment. > It's probably not as important in places where it's still

Like I said, my objection was based on the way you had phrased that last sentence in your comment. > It's probably not as important in places where it's still cheaper to hire humans than it is to install a robot in most cases. The reason universal basic income does not work in India is not because people here still have their $3/day jobs. It doesn't work because there is simply not enough wealth here to restribute, so the problem here is still one of creation of wealth.