3 ms·
I personally think the humanities education would be better served by divorcing it from making a living (which it actually traditionally was for centuries, and
by RcouF1uZ4gsC 5y ago
I personally think the humanities education would be better served by divorcing it from making a living (which it actually traditionally was for centuries, and only changed in the last 100 or so years).
Making it about supporting yourself, kind of actually hurts humanities education and, I think, inevitably distorts it.
Rather, it should be about becoming a well-rounded person independent of making money.
I am a software engineer and have a comfortable salary. However, I would love to be able to do deeper study into History, Art, and Philosophy, not because it will enable me to make more money, but simply because it would make me a better person and expose me to a deeper understanding of the ups and downs of being human.
Maybe humanities needs to change its target primarily from 18 year olds who are figuring out what to do with their lives, to 40 year olds, who already make money, but want to learn more about what it means to be human.
- Chris2048 5y ago> Maybe humanities needs to change its target primarily from 18 year olds who are figuring out what to do with their lives, to 40 year olds, who already make money, but want to learn more about what it means to be human. I think a lot of higher education would be best life-long learning. The amount of stuff you learn before any real-world XP, only to forget (or cling unhealthily to) feels v. wasteful. A professors time might be best spent on adults in the field. That said, for the humanities, there still needs to be a marketable skill-set that underpins the field.