> No, my point is the morality of it doesn’t matter in the end I don't understand this mindset. If enough people take actions to punish immoral behavior, then

> No, my point is the morality of it doesn’t matter in the end I don't understand this mindset. If enough people take actions to punish immoral behavior, then it will have a real and meaningful impact. For example, apartheid in South Africa was eventually seen as immoral by a critical mass of people who then took action via sanctions and boycotts. Which eventually resulted in the fall of the apartheid regime. Is it your belief that we should never take action against moral injustices? Or that we should indulge in anything that benefits us, regardless of morality? If that's not what you're saying, please explain your response in this context >>> We should have kept so much stuff in the Pacific >> None of that belongs to the US > Nothing belongs to anyone. It’s about what you can occupy and defend.