The most common failure is just listing down the changes done in the code (the ones you can just read with `git diff`), I hate that Exactly. But I have noticed

The most common failure is just listing down the changes done in the code (the ones you can just read with `git diff`), I hate that Exactly. But I have noticed for some people this seems just really hard, don't know why exactly. Even after repeating and explaining the same thing (git commits, just like comments in code, should explain why, not what, the what can be inferred from the code and if not the code is usually not very good) I see people struggling with coming up with an acceptable explanation in full sentences of why a change was made.