2 ms·
lossless reversible jpeg recompression seems to be a nod to the fact that jpegs aren't going anywhere.
by andrius4669 5y ago
lossless reversible jpeg recompression seems to be a nod to the fact that jpegs aren't going anywhere.
- romanovcode 5y agoOn the web you want to use WebP nowadays so I would not be so sure.
- pabs3 5y agoJPEG XL is allegedly better than WebP, so once browsers get support, seems like it would be the future.
- acdha 5y agoWebP is slower and frequently the size benefits are quite small, even non-existent, as you’d expect for an old codec. Anyone concerned about bandwidth or features is probably going to want to support newer formats like HEIC which offer better performance to offset the cost of managing multiple formats.
- p0nce 5y agoWebP has a bit less features, for example it's only 4:2:0 (which looks great).
- formerly_proven 5y agoWell that kinda depends, 4:2:0 is good enough for video and photo uses, but falls over pretty hard when confronted with synthetic images (e.g. UIs).
- lcnmrn 5y agoJPEG XL has a non backwards compatible mode too for highest quality/compression and the bitstream can be improved with better encoders in the future.