3 ms·
By ‘net positive’ I mean willing to take a cut larger than is directly proportional to the reduction in hours worked. The reality is that reducing each person’s
by nickff 5y ago
By ‘net positive’ I mean willing to take a cut larger than is directly proportional to the reduction in hours worked. The reality is that reducing each person’s annual work will increase costs for the company overall, as it needs to pay additional overhead and benefits, which are related to employee count, rather than hours worked.
I think that everyone is a bit wary of setting difficult precedents in employment situations, as well as the possibility of creating rifts between people with different ‘deals’. That said, I think we should all place a higher priority on coming up with mutually beneficial arrangements.
- jobigoud 5y agoExcept that it increases employees morale and motivation and thus productivity, and reduces chances of burnout. There are benefits for the company too.
- dopidopHN 5y agoExactly. I stay longer in a previous company with unlimited PTO ( real one ) for that reason. It’s crazy how they don’t realize it’s just alienate workers.
- dopidopHN 5y agoI see : yes, I’m compensated roughly $3000 / week. I don’t know how much I do cost per week but probably around $4000 ? Idk. As I stated it’s easily worth 5k for me. ( 7 days, 5 days would be $3500 ) That négociation did not go well. I got 2 extra day off and was told to stop making noise. Oh. well.