3 ms·
I hear this all the time and yet…nearly all of the websites failed. This tells me that “you have to go out of your way…” doesn’t tell the whole story. There’s
by nobodyandproud 5y ago
I hear this all the time and yet…nearly all of the websites failed.
This tells me that “you have to go out of your way…” doesn’t tell the whole story.
There’s clearly a disconnect between best-practice in-the-field UIs & framework; and what semantic web recommends.
Rather than attacking the government websites and businesses, pushing tooling to enforce good semantics would surely would be better?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- pseudalopex 5y agoCriticism isn't attack. Nearly all had some issue. It doesn't mean they were completely unusable. The disconnect is between common practice and good practice. Low contrast was 1 of the common problems. Usually this is a choice. And it's trivial to check.
- wffurr 5y agoIt never fails to amaze me how seemingly impossible it is to get a web development firm to just write: <form> <label>Full name: <input type="text"></label> <label>Date of birth: <input type="date"></label> <label>Zip code: <input type="text"></label> <input type="submit" value="Submit"> </form> And then sprinkle a little CSS on top to make the colors match the client's theme. It's really simple.
- userbinator 5y agoThat's because web developers seem to have the notion that if it's not complex and hard, they have a hard time justifying their pay. So they make it complex, and when something like accessibility or browser support inevitably fails, they can charge more to "fix" it --- by of course adding even more complexity, and the cycle repeats.