5 ms·
Wow, you read that post about not being smug and not assuming you know better than the experts on the ground ... and decided to throw in a couple of 3%-baked (a
by kthejoker2 5y ago
Wow, you read that post about not being smug and not assuming you know better than the experts on the ground ... and decided to throw in a couple of 3%-baked (at best) "solutions" complete with a "Just" to let everyone know how dumb they are not to see this obvious thing?
Hubris doesn't do it justice ...
- sumedh 5y agoNot sure why you thought I am smug. If you read OP's comment he said the locals wanted a solution for the wild pigs. Instead of giving some constructive feedback about the solutions you just wanted to attack me. I am not saying those people are dumb but as per your flawed argument no one else can come up with a solution to help those people so no-one should try. That is more like a crab mentality.
- kthejoker2 5y agoThe locals didn't want a solution for the wild pigs; they were well aware of them, and already had ways of dealing with them. You're not even solving the right problem. The shallowness of your comment is a perfect microcosm of Mackenzie Scott's giving philosophy.
- sumedh 5y agoWhat were the ways of dealing them? Why were they not using the fertile soil if they had dealt with the pigs? >You're not even solving the right problem. What is the right problem then? The NGO's and others alway have an option not to accept Mackenzie's money so I dont know why you are complaining?