3 ms·
Again, "killing off all humans" is not the only concern. We already know about the mass extinction event that's being caused by our current activities. (This is
by DangitBobby 5y ago
Again, "killing off all humans" is not the only concern. We already know about the mass extinction event that's being caused by our current activities. (This is only partly caused by global warming, of course). Ignoring that is unconscionable. And we can see the effects of the climate change already happening to humans even in the US, with rare floods happening almost every year and record setting heat waves and droughts causing power problems and water insecurity. So clearly there will need to be some behavior modification or big actions to tackle the new normal.
Anyway, it doesn't really seem like switching away from fuels that spew poison into the air and periodically facilitate catastrophic harm to ocean wildlife is going to, uh "cripple or destroy civilization." As for costs:
> Global warming comes with a big price tag for every country around the
world. The 80 percent reduction in U.S. emissions that will be needed to
lead international action to stop climate change may not come cheaply,
but the cost of failing to act will be much greater. New research shows that if present
trends continue, the total cost of global warming will be as high as 3.6 percent of gross
domestic product (GDP). Four global warming impacts alone—hurricane damage,
real estate losses, energy costs, and water costs—will come with a price tag of 1.8
percent of U.S. GDP, or almost $1.9 trillion annually (in today’s dollars) by 2100. We
know how to avert most of these damages through strong national and international
action to reduce the emissions that cause global warming. But we must act now. The
longer we wait, the more painful—and expensive—the consequences will be.
1. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/cost.pdf https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/cost.pdf
- exporectomy 5y agoKilling off humans is the only concern I was talking about. Obviously other things are predicted to happen, and may be worth preventing, depending on the cost. > the total cost of global warming will be as high as 3.6 percent of gross domestic product This is what I mean by tame. That cost is equivalent to just a couple of years of paused economic growth. It means living in the year 2100 will feel like 2095 or so in terms of GDP. That's not a very serious problem.