3 ms·
I find these superficial debunkers even more tedious than the aliens are here crowd, since they selectively focus only on evidence that supports their POV whils
by creamytaco 5y ago
I find these superficial debunkers even more tedious than the aliens are here crowd, since they selectively focus only on evidence that supports their POV whilst conveniently ignoring everything else.
Given eye-witness testimony by trained pilots there are two possibilities that I see:
+ Pilots are telling the truth, the phenomenon is real, the actors unknown (could be the US, foreign adversaries, ..)
+ Pilots are lying and this is some sort of prank or government propaganda / psychological operation.
What's not at all probable given the facts, are the explanations that fakenous.net put up.
- egfx 5y ago> since they selectively focus only on evidence that supports their POV whilst conveniently ignoring everything else. Sounds like the New York Times model. I think journalists basically feel the need, in fact it’s their job to do this because they think the narrative is paramount to everything else.