3 ms·
It’s more the effects of free circulating spike protein in the bloodstream than mRNA triggering ribosomes.
by captainredbeard 5y ago
It’s more the effects of free circulating spike protein in the bloodstream than mRNA triggering ribosomes.
- ganzuul 5y agoI don't understand what you are saying. What is the significance of either of those?
- lima 5y agoAnd cytotoxicity - with the second shot, the body will have cytotoxic T cells which could target some of the transfected cells. But, why not to be worried: - It's a normal process and most cells will be replaced. - The effects would be tiny, especially compared to an infection with the real thing. If this was causing widespread issues, we would know by now. - All studies done so far indicate that only a very small amount will enter systemic circulation. It's a classic risk tradeoff, and the risks of taking the vaccine are much smaller than the risk of getting the real infection (billions of viruses replicating vs. one-time dose, real spike protein vs. stabilized spike protein).
- Majromax 5y ago> It’s more the effects of free circulating spike protein in the bloodstream than mRNA triggering ribosomes. The mRNA vaccines are designed to express the spike protein in a membrane-bound form; very little is found floating free. See https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/spike-protein-circulating-in-the-vaccinated-what-does-it-mean https://www.deplatformdisease.com/blog/spike-protein-circula.... Additionally, the mRNA vaccines express a modified spike protein that is stabilized in its "prefusion" state (as seen on the virus itself before it binds with a cell), and the resulting complex seems to have somewhat fewer effects even when it does interact with a cell.