> It is quite worrying that the powers-that-be at YouTube are taking this radically anti-speech approach. Where you see "radical anti-sperch approach" I see a

> It is quite worrying that the powers-that-be at YouTube are taking this radically anti-speech approach. Where you see "radical anti-sperch approach" I see a vestigial amount of false positives within a constant stream of crackpot and outright insane, anti-infellectual fearmongering-fueled conspiracy theories. And let's face it: since when do appeals to authority pass off as a reliable indicator that the author is not a crackpot conspiracy theorist? I mean, during the past year the world had to endure a good share of people abusing their medical licenses to peddle bullshit conspiracy theories.