3 ms·
I understand the performance criticism. But people don't have that many apps, storage is cheap and we have plenty of ram. Today a high end smartphone has 128gb
by speedgoose 5y ago
I understand the performance criticism. But people don't have that many apps, storage is cheap and we have plenty of ram. Today a high end smartphone has 128gb of storage and 8gb of ram. Some have 512gb of storage and 12gb of ram. An actual high end desktop computer has at least 64gb of ram and enough storage to have quite a lot of Electron runtimes installed side by side.
My M1 MacBook pro with only 8gb of ram, I asked 16gb but someone did an ordering mistake, has no issues to run multiple electrons apps at the same time and storage is not something I think about.
By responsive I mean accomoding different display sizes, to have a layout that makes sense on a small laptop with a touchscreen or a 4k 32" external display.
For most usages, I will rate react much higher than Qt5, like almost everyone one in the the industry. The only Qt interface that I think is nice and up to modern standards, and that I remember is the Tesla user interface. It may be a few others because sometimes Qt makes sense, but not for desktop in my humble opinion.
- ThrowawayR2 5y ago> "But people don't have that many apps, storage is cheap and we have plenty of ram." Appliance maker: "Electricity is cheap and there's plenty of it, who cares if all the devices we sell costs the consumer on their electricity bill and causes power plants to pollute the atmosphere more." Car manufacturer: "Fossil fuel is cheap and there's plenty of it, who cares if all the cars we sell cost the customer extra at the pump and adds to air pollution." There was a reckoning for both of those fields and there will eventually be a reckoning for software development as well.
- speedgoose 5y agoI am a bit too lazy to do the maths, but I would guess that a single Electron development team consumes a lot less energy than many native development teams.