3 ms·
Pretty shoddy journalism to not reach out to BACL for comments. Sounds like they’re just toeing the party line. Maybe BACL really are total scumbags, but I stil
by Tabular-Iceberg 5y ago
Pretty shoddy journalism to not reach out to BACL for comments. Sounds like they’re just toeing the party line. Maybe BACL really are total scumbags, but I still want to hear both sides of the story.
Maybe the only way to get some useful insight is if there was litigation. Do the MRAs actually specify where the physical testing happens, or is it just about where the legal responsibility falls? Does it matter if the cable to the spectrum analyser is 5 m or 11,000 km long?
- makeitdouble 5y agoI feel in this day and age the BACL doesn’t have to respond to individual journalists on every case and could just publish a statement if they feel the need to clarify anything. If it was an individual with limited resources or no official internet presence, or specific circumstances it would be a different matter of course.