I agree with the general sentiment of this post, but like others, I think some explanations lack depth and possibly miss important active developments. This pa

I agree with the general sentiment of this post, but like others, I think some explanations lack depth and possibly miss important active developments. This passage made me laugh though: > The funny thing is, the same people who absolutely insist that the Church Turing thesis means muh computer is all-powerful simulator of everything, or repeat the fantasy that AI will replace everyone’s jobs will come up with elaborate reasons why these things listed above are too hard to achieve in the corporeal world, despite most of them being solved problems from the VLSI era of computer engineering.